- 1 India’s Surgical Strikes Against Terrorists Essay, Speech, Article, Story
- 2 Questions
India’s Surgical Strikes Against Terrorists Essay, Speech, Article, Story
Indian Army carried out surgical strikes on Pakistani terrorists located across the Line of Control on terror launch pads on Wednesday night. Director-General of Military Operations Lt General Ranbir Singh in a joint press conference with the MEA exposed that Indian forces led by a Special Operations Group led the surgical strikes procedure and caused major casualties to terrorists and those who were protecting them that incorporated two Pakistani soldiers, and smashed seven terror camp and the amount of casualties of terrorists across the LoC is about 50.
Who Knew About Surgical Strikes?
PM Narendra Modi had updated President Pranab Mukherjee, Vice President, and previous Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on the surgical strikes. Jammu and Kashmir Governor and CM Mehbooba Mufti have also been informed regarding the surgical strike.
When Surgical Strikes Took Place?
External cleverness is critical in carrying out these attacks and these special operation teams operate strongly with the service intelligence departments, Intelligence Bureau, and R&AW hawks. On September 29, 2016, India went open with what seems to be a paradigm shift in the country’s war against the terrorist groups working from bases on the Pakistani side of the Line of Control (LoC) separating Jammu and Kashmir.
In lawful terms, India has cast the strikes as pre-emptive self-defense in the expression of an imminent attack by terrorists across the LoC, placed against the background of Pakistan’s rejection to act against these groups in spite of having a compulsion to do so. Pre-emptive self-defense is a controversial notion in international law.
The Plan of Surgical Strikes against Terrorists
The strikes were aimed at terrorist infrastructure rather than Pakistani armed forces installations, though casualties were also inflicted on “those trying to guard” the terrorists there, meaning, most probably Pakistani troops. Of all the armed forces available to the Indian side, this was measured by analysts to be the first – and least expensive in terms of escalatory potential.
The Pakistani military spokesperson consequently released an announcement denying there had been any Indian cross-border raids and that the Indians were claiming cross-LoC fire as “surgical strikes”.
The Pakistani reaction claiming no surgical strikes have taken place may, paradoxically, allows Islamabad to keep the political and armed temperature down, which would also go well with India. To that level, the Indian unwillingness to go public with fine points of the strikes may assist prevent the building up of public stress in Pakistan for some sort of vengeance. The more data the Indian side gets into in public, the more difficult it might be for Pakistan to be dismissive.
The strikes are being observed as the foremost major military action taken by India after terrorists from Pakistan crossed into a military camp in Uri in Kashmir this month. 18 soldiers were killed in that attack, one which Prime Minister Narendra Modi had said would “not go unpunished.”
Conclusion on India’s Surgical Strikes against Terrorist in Pakistan
Surgical strikes achieve significance in India’s case as Pakistan has constantly shown its intention to use strategic nuclear weapons on Indian Forces, even risking the collateral harm to its own troops, to prevent Indian military operations. Therefore, the hidden surgical strikes are a great weapon for the Indian armed forces to carry out the essential dirty work while ensuring the status-quo among the conflicting armies on the LoC.
- Surgical Strikes Essay
- Essay on Surgical Strikes
- Article on Surgical Strikes
- Article on India’s Surgical Strikes in Pakistan
- Speech on Surgical Strikes
- Speech on India’s Surgical Strikes against Terrorist